Inuits say that the sky has changed.

[Agartha]

The sky has changed: Inuit elders sharing information with NASA regarding Earth's wobble.

We are all obsessed with the weather here in the West and rightly so with the unusual weather we have had to endure recently, extreme has become the new norm but what about our brothers and sisters living on the Canadian Arctic circle?
Inuit knowledge and climate change was discussed by delegates at the recent global warming summit in Copenhagen and what the Eskimo elders are saying have NASA, scientists and experts alike worried....Global warming might not be the whole story!

It seems the Inuit elders are also witnessing strange and unfathomable weather up there in the North.
The elders talk about how their world has changed, how it was then and how it is now.
It is a worrying picture, a picture of melting glaciers and thinning or disappearing sea ice.
Seals with burns on their coats and covered with sores and a thinner hide, the Seal skin has deteriorated and while scientists maintain man made pollution is contributing to climate change the elders are convinced something much much bigger is going on!
Astonishingly what the elders are saying is global warming is not the whole story...

The elders maintain the Sun doesn't rise were it used too, they have longer day light to hunt and the Sun is higher than it used to be and warms up quicker than before.
The elders who were interviewed across the north all said the same thing, their sky has changed.
The stars the Sun and the Moon have all changed affecting the temperature, even affecting the way the wind blows, it is becoming increasingly hard to predict the weather, something that is a must on the Arctic.

The elders all agree, they believe the Earth has shifted, wobbled or tilted to the North.

Zacharius Kunuk has literally been e-mailing NASA with information from the elders regarding changes in the sky and the position of the Earth on its axis....

More here: http://www.thebigwobble.org/2014/12/their-sky-has-changed-inuit-elders.html?utm_source=BP_recent

[Rogue]

Is this related to the drifting North magnetic pole?

[Agartha]

They are not saying..... but it could well be.

[Rogue]

That would be my hunch, interesting indeed.

[Monk (in hiding)]

Waiting for Ken to chime in.

[Rockhopper]

The Earth wobbles on it's axis too a bit like a slowly spinning top. That could account for what they are noticing. 

The Magnetic Poles also travel through an ellipse but that shouldn't change the position of the stars and sun.

Tim.

[Monk (in hiding)]

Wobble theory is obsolete, it has some mathematical problems!

Current LuniSolar Model

The current explanation for why we see this precession of the equinox is that the tug of the Sun and the Moon acting upon the Earth’s bulge (<1% wider at equator) causes the Earth to gyrate so that the pole axis slowly traces a circle in the sky over about 24,000 to 26,000 years. This model, commonly seen in textbooks, mixes nutation with precession and obfuscates the fact that these are two separate phenomenons, one local and short in duration (nutation) and one non-local and very long in duration (precession).

The Lunisolor Precession theory was originally developed before there was any formal knowledge of binary stars or their motions, and before there was any recognition that the solar system might be moving. While this theory is a good first attempt at explaining the observed phenomenon (within a static solar system), it relies on certain untested assumptions concerning the composition and stability of the earth’s core and the moon’s solidity, and has had to be modified a number of times over the years to get the calculation to fit the ever changing observable. Most astronomers do not pay attention to precession theory and consider these changes to be minor tweaks but they are actually telltale signs of the problems with current theory.

Another problem with current theory is the moon is thought to be the principal force acting upon the oblate earth. However, the moon is slowly receding from the earth (thereby theoretically producing less torque) whereas the precession rate is slowly speeding up (an indication of a greater force at work). Few are aware of the changing rate of precession thus little attention has been paid to the fact that the observable seems to contradict the theory concerning the forces at work. To date, this issue has not been addressed in the literature. (Update: Since we began our work the IAU has come out with resolution P03, which notes that the current lunisolar precession theory “is not consistent with dynamical theory”. We are hopeful this will lead to an acknowledgement that the precession observable includes motion of the solar system relative to the VLBI reference points – and that this recognition will advance the eventual adoption of a precession model that accounts for more than just local dynamics).

And of course the biggest failure of the current lunisolar theory is it makes no allowance for the different reference frames (a moving solar system versus fixed stars) and therefore requires that the earth change orientation relative to all objects, near and far, at the same rate. Such is not the case.

http://binaryresearchinstitute.org/bri/research/introduction/precession.shtml

[Rockhopper]

Interesting hypothesis VM/Omega let's see what other Scientists make of it. The current Wobble Theory has not been discredited yet but it may well be in the future.

Tim.

[Sponsored content]