Re: The Truth About the Wars...

[Kaere]

^^^ The f*ck kind of hateful shit is that to post?!

[Monk (in hiding)]

Black people NOW have the same RIGHTS as everyone else. One of these is the RIGHT TO KEEP AND BARE ARMS.....

PUT YOUR READING GLASSES ON!

[Agartha]

Black people NOW have the same RIGHTS as everyone else. One of these is the RIGHT TO KEEP AND BARE ARMS.....

PUT YOUR READING GLASSES ON!

Stop labelling people by calling them colours.... we are all the same, we are all people.

And we do not accept that kind of racist comments and posts on this forum.

[Kaere]

VM, Put yours on and read further than the first paragraph! The quote you've posted is from 1856.

It goes on to say that giving black people all those rights will lead to "inevitably producing discontent and insubordination among them, and endangering the peace and safety of the State".

Which is telling me that the quote is about all the BAD THINGS THAT WILL HAPPEN IF YOU GIVE THEM THE SAME RIGHTS. It's a part of the argument in this case for NOT granting blacks citizenship or letting them have freedoms.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dred_Scott_v._Sandford

Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857), was a landmark decision by the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court held that African Americans, whether enslaved or free, could not be American citizens and therefore had no standing to sue in federal court,[2][3] and that the federal government had no power to regulate slavery in the federal territories acquired after the creation of the United States. Dred Scott, an enslaved African American man who had been taken by his owners to free states and territories, attempted to sue for his freedom. In a 7–2 decision written by Chief Justice Roger B. Taney, the Court denied Scott's request. For only the second time in its history the Supreme Court ruled an Act of Congress to be unconstitutional.[4]

Although Taney hoped that his ruling would settle the slavery question once and for all, the decision immediately spurred vehement dissent from anti-slavery elements in the North, especially Republicans. Most scholars today (as did many contemporary lawyers) consider the ruling regarding slavery in the territories to be dictum, not binding precedent. The decision would prove to be an indirect catalyst for the American Civil War. It was functionally superseded by the Civil Rights Act of 1866 and by the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which gave blacks full citizenship. As of 2007 it is widely regarded by scholars as the worst decision made by the United States Supreme Court.[3][5][6]

See that? It's from a case where it was determined that blacks, whether enslaved or free, could NOT be made American citizens and therefore could not sue for their freedom, could not live where they pleased, etc.

[Lenzabi]

Humans, they all smell the same when burnt.

[Kaere]

I apologize for my previous language.

[Rockhopper]

No prob. Ka. Sometimes we need to set the record straight using strong words!

Tim.

[Agartha]

Yeah, don't worry K.... we all do it sometimes.

[Agartha]

Ok, you have probably not seen this anywhere in the news, but this happened 2 days ago in London: a peaceful demonstration that stopped the traffic in some places.

[Lenzabi]

Amazing! Michael Brown's family would be very touched by this.

[Agartha]

Amazing! Michael Brown's family would be very touched by this.

And yet it was not shown anywhere!!

Michael Brown was a criminal and an idiotic bully, but he didn't deserve to be killed like this.
The problem is stereotyping, people thinking that all black men are like him, when they are not.

All lives matter.

[Lenzabi]

Also, I looked up the missouri laws regarding the shoplifting, it specifically states that a store is to merely file a civil action to recover the money. Police are not necessary, but they do get called by stores anyway, here is WV, if someone take goods w/o paying, many stores just let them walk out to avoid issues and file it as a tax loss.

That and the officer was recorded by another person and you could see he was a bully by nature. Brown was a graduating kid with issues, bad mix when gun is involved, and there were many mistakes made by the police in this matter

Seven mistakes made in fact that really never should have happened, but cops know how to ruin evidence against them.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/11/25/ferguson-grand-jury-evidence-mistakes_n_6220814.html

[Monk (in hiding)]

Construction workers witnessed Michael Brown shooting -> http://myfox8.com/2014/09/09/construction-workers-witnessed-michael-brown-shooting/

“…kind of walking back toward the cop,” his “hands were still up” and the witness described Officer “Wilson backing up as he fired.”

[Ken McClellan]

Actually read the Protocols sometime instead of the boxtop BS in a Wiki article. Treat them like a checklist of what has to happen before a very old Bible narrative gets played out on the world stage. See how close three designs for the perfect parasite (one racial, one religious order, one group of heretics) have come to achieving the list. Then figure out which of the three is winning based on the code within (consistent with the god of Crowley). Hint: Admirers of Pike -- find the 11th book of the Bible, the 11th chapter, the 11th verse and see what it spells.

[Monk (in hiding)]

123 what are we fighting for, don't ask me, I don't give a damn, next stop Vietnam......

[Ken McClellan]

You would like a Youtube vid called:
THIS? WILL BLOW YOUR MIND! Anunnaki in the ANTARCTIC?
Enjoy!

[Sponsored content]